Analysis: San Francisco Wi-Fi won't target all users

Page 3 of 4

None of these users would have their Web visits tracked, he said. What would be tracked, with or without an active iGoogle account, is the unique address of the device. Google will watch the size and frequency of each device's data transfers, as well as its location. This is to prevent abuse of the network, Sacca said. Whatever information is collected will be discarded after no more than 180 days, he said.

As for targeted advertising covering the costs of the free service, it won't happen, at least in the beginning.

"That could be done, but it's not the prime motivation for the project," Sacca said. "We have not put an emphasis on building a layer of location-based services yet."

Instead, Google sees the service as an experiment, like the Wi-Fi network set to launch soon in its hometown of Mountain View, which he said has no revenue model.

"I'm in the very exciting position of being able to start and build stuff without having a short or medium-term [return-on-investment] model," Sacca said.

Google seems to have backpedaled on its plans since the privacy advocates wrote letters and eventually met with the company, said Nicole Ozer, technology and civil liberties policy director at the ACLU of Northern California. "I think it was a surprise to both Google and the city," Ozer said.

The city used the letters from the ACLU and its partners in crafting its RFP, asking potential providers how they would address those concerns, according to Chris Vein, executive director of the city's Department of Telecommunications and Information Services.   


The IDG News Service is a Network World affiliate.


« Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next »

Recent News:
· Google comes in fourth on top 10 list of spam enablers
· The CAN-SPAM Act as a warning
· The State of Spam: What to Expect in 2009
· Twitter hit with phishing scam
· Psychic predictions for tech in 2009